▴ MENU/TOP
CUB logo

Shale Gas Update: EPA links fracking, groundwater contamination

We noted in our post on December 2nd that EPA has begun a national study on the impacts of fracking on drinking water and that the results of that study would likely be sometime in coming. Nothing has changed in that regard. However, EPA also began a much smaller study in Wyoming some time ago and, in the days since our blog post, has released a draft of their findings (PDF) in this more localized study.

It should be noted at the outset that the results of the investigation are preliminary, have yet to undergo peer review, and apply only to Pavillion, WY. Nevertheless, the findings are significant in that they appear to corroborate what environmentalists have long feared: Given the right circumstances, chemicals from fracking fluid can and do make their way into drinking water. The findings, as summarized in the press release are unequivocal:

“Chemicals detected in the most recent samples are consistent with those identified in earlier EPA samples and include methane, other petroleum hydrocarbons and other chemical compounds. The presence of these compounds is consistent with migration from areas of gas production. Detections in drinking water wells are generally below established health and safety standards. In the fall of 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry reviewed EPA’s data and recommended that affected well owners take several precautionary steps, including using alternate sources of water for drinking and cooking, and ventilation when showering. Those recommendations remain in place and Encana has been funding the provision of alternate water supplies.”

Needless to say, the gas industry is not pleased with the EPA’s findings. Canadian gas giant Encana (owner of the wells covered in the study) had the following to say in response: “These preliminary conclusions do not stand up to the rigor of a non-partisan, scientific-based review […]” and “[c]onclusions drawn by the EPA are irresponsible given the limited number of sampling events on the EPA deep wells and the number of anomalies seen in the data.”

While the company is correct that the findings are not conclusive, they are likely to provide more fuel for the growing debate about the real environmental costs of shale gas extraction in the U.S and, so far, the science has not been tipping the scales in the industry’s favor.

To keep up with CUB, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter!

Comments
  • 1.How can I find out more info on fracking projects in the northwest? How can we fight this?

    Steve Henderson | January 2012

  • 2.Steve - There are currently no fracking projects active in the northwest, but the Coos Bay Basin may get some pressure for development in the coming years (see http://oregoncub.org/news/posts/natural-gas-update-technology-and-regulatory-advances).

    NW Natural and other utilities in the region receive gas from fracking projects in the Rocky Mountain region. Other projects are located in the Midwest and in Pennsylvania and New York, with a few scattered around Texas and the south.

    It’s unlikely that other projects will be proposed around Oregon, but as always we’ll be keeping our eye on the situation.

    oregoncub | January 2012 | Portland, OR

Comment Form

« Back