▴ MENU/TOP
CUB logo

Changing Rules to Prevent Utility Shutoffs

A Black family of three plays in the comfort of their living room at home. Utility shutoffs disproportionately affect people of color.

The Oregon Public Utility Commission (PUC), the state’s utility regulator, is proposing new rules to protect customers from utility shutoffs. Utility shutoffs are more than an inconvenience - they are incredibly painful, dangerous, and expensive for families. Low-income households and people of color are most likely to have their power shut off. These proposed rule changes would be a major win for Oregon households.

The proposed rules contain changes that provide utility protections for low-income customers and those with significant health risks, including:

  • Ending late payment charges for low-income customers
  • No service shutoffs for those with significant health risks
  • Eliminating deposits for low-income households and requiring utilities to return deposits to low-income residential customers
  • Limiting charging reconnection fees for low-income customers
  • Preventing utility shutoffs in many extreme weather situations, including extreme cold or heat, and poor air quality.

CUB believes these rules reduce energy burden for low-income customers and are a step in the right direction. However, we continue to advocate that they go further.

Shutoffs are Bad for Households
When a home’s electricity gets shut off, it can very easily cause a cascading effect for that family. We use energy in so many ways in our home: physical safety and comfort, food safety, communication, healthcare, entertainment, and more. Losing power comes with many hidden costs, especially for low-income households who can least afford these expenses.

For those with medical conditions that require electricity, a shutoff can be life-threatening. Losing power to a medical device or heating/cooling can quickly turn into an unsafe situation for many Oregonians. Safely storing medicine that requires refrigeration is also impossible, forcing people to replace expensive prescriptions like insulin.

Losing power also means losing refrigeration for food. Having to replace a refrigerator full of food is incredibly expensive. This can force a household to choose between buying new groceries and restoring power. For many low-income families, losing power can be devastating to their budgets outside of just the energy expenses.

If not reversed, shutoffs can also cause families to lose their housing entirely. Without electricity, renters can be evicted. Even if you own your home, living without power can be grounds to lose ownership. Oregon is facing a housing crisis. We should not be continuing shutoff policies that contribute to homelessness.

Oregonians should not have to pay deposits to get their utilities turned on.
In the proposed rule changes, low-income customers will no longer face utility deposits. CUB and community advocates are in support of this rule, but would like it to go further.

CUB, along with other community advocates, is pushing to remove any credit requirement for utility service. We believe these rules are outdated, disproportionately target low-income customers, and present an unnecessary barrier to utility access. Energy service is a vital resource for all Oregonians.

CUB has successfully advocated for utilities to voluntarily end deposits. We will continue to advocate for rules to make this a permanent requirement for all utilities.

Customers should be able to pay their bill at the time the utility comes to disconnect their services.
Currently, utilities may accept payment (including cash) “at the door” if a utility comes to a customer’s home. If a customer wants to pay a bill in person to avoid a shutoff, they should be able to.

Unfortunately, regulators’ proposed rule changes don’t require utilities to accept in-person payment. Rather, they propose that utilities must notify customers that they have 24 hours to contact the utility and make arrangements to pay the bill. But it doesn’t make sense to shut off someone’s utilities when they are standing there with payment. This proposed rule doesn’t go far enough, and CUB has requested that the PUC change the rule to require utilities to accept payment at the door.

The Process of Changing Shutoff Rules
CUB and other advocates, Oregon utilities, and PUC Staff have spent the last two months working on additional shutoff protections for customers. The decision now goes to Commissioners to adopt new shutoff rules (see docket AR 653). CUB thinks the proposed rules are a step in the right direction, but hopes the PUC will consider and accept our suggestions for additional protections.

As many struggled financially in 2020, regulators worked to protect customers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The PUC accepted an agreement from electric and natural gas utilities that protects customers’ access to energy. CUB fought hard to make these protections some of the strongest in the country.

These 2020 agreements included protecting customers from utility shutoffs and pausing the utility deposit rule. Regulators also began to investigate permanent ways to help households keep their utilities turned on.

Now, the PUC is looking to permanently change rules around utility disconnections, payment plans, late fees, and deposits. Regulators are also analyzing other barriers to keeping utilities on. This includes alternatives to shutoffs and protecting customers during times of severe weather and harmful air quality.

The PUC will hold a final meeting in this rulemaking on September 1, 2022, at 1:30pm. The PUC is accepting written comments on the proposed rules up until 4:00pm on September 7, 2022. You can find information on how to participate at the public meeting or submit written comments here. When sending your comment, make sure to include “Docket AR 653” in your subject line and comments.

Donate to CUB Today

To keep up with CUB, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter!

07/26/22  |  3 Comments  |  Changing Rules to Prevent Utility Shutoffs

Comments
  • 1.Hi my name is Jodi. We had our water shut off because we could not pay. Iam not proud of it but that has happened at least 5 times in ten years. Now when my water was shut off I owed 415.00$ Now three months later, and after looking at the three Bill's receivedfor those 3 months, they actually charged 105.00 for each month. Stormwater services, treatment services, etc . So had to pay 745.00 to get back on. None of which were reconnection fees. How can charge for services when not getting? And those 3 months were each higher than if I had my water.

    Jodi | January 2023

  • 2.If there isn't funding available for low income, and those on cash assistance there should be extensions allowed in order for customers PGE to seek alternatives. It becomes an uninhabitable situation for children in the home, pregnant women, elderly, disabled and or those with health conditions have services disconnected.

    Anonymous | June 2023

  • 3.Hi. I had my electric shut off without adequate notice. I got behind on a bill. Made a payment. Then I got another bill a couple weeks later. It stated on the bill that I had a past due amount AND the new bill. It was combined, highlighted in red and it gave me a date about 9 days away to pay. It said on the bill I had till that specific date (I don’t have the said bill on me right now, but it was several days away.). I pulled into my driveway after getting that bill in my mailbox intent on paying it. Except when I tried to get in my garage, my electric had been shut off. 6-9 days BEFORE the date stated on the bill I was holding. When I called them they told me that their wording can be misleading, but that even though they combined the total and highlighted it in red and said I had till a certain a date to
    Pay, that only meant the most current bill. My past due amount was due immediately. Even though it was combined with the current bill, highlighted and stated on the bill I still had several days. PLUS I received no disconnect notice. The “company” stated that they don’t do 24-hour disconnect notices! How is that legal?!? They stated that I had been sent a letter in the mail. I never received that letter. The woman called me liar. Turns out, several of my peices of mail had been delivered to a different address. This disconnect notice was sent out a week and a half before the disconnect date. But I didn’t receive it. THEN they forced me to pay a deposit. After I’d been a paying customer for a year! I’ve been paying electric bills for 25 years. A few times I’ve been close to having it turned off. And I’ve NEVER had an electric company turn off electric without serving a 24 hour disconnect notice to the front door at the very least. This particular electric company says they “just don’t do that”.
    Is that even allowed? I read there was some type of regulation that a utility company had to give an in person 24 hour disconnect notice. Is this true? Is it legal to make an existing customer of a year then pay a deposit for their electric service to be continued? They claimed that they would waive it if I signed up for their auto pay. But their auto pay wasn’t consistent. I wouldn’t have a set date of it coming out. Just a set date it had to be out BY. I can’t do an auto pay when I don’t know exactly how much and exactly when it is coming out. I can’t trust that. This company can’t even word their bills correctly! How could I trust for them to do their auto pay correctly?!? Then they said I could do their pre-pay as you go (or something like that, it sounded equally as shady). I declined all those options and was forced to pay over a $300 deposit PLUS a reconnect fee. THEN they told me that the deposit didn’t help me. That if I was late on a bill they would still disconnect me. That the deposit doesn’t help cover a bill if you are late. And you can’t get your deposit back unless you’ve made on time payments for a year. But if you are late once… they start the year over.
    How is ANY of that legal? Can anything be done? They are awful people. Tried to say that that had so many customers they don’t have time to do door to door disconnect notices. They only have 35,000 customers. Other cities have SO MANY MORE, and yet those companies seem to make it work.
    Can anything be done? This is in a small coastal town in Oregon. From what I’ve been hearing… a lot of people are fed up with this particular company. Something needs to happen.

    Danielle Banton | June 2023

Comment Form

« Back