Keep up with CUB!
sign up for e-news
|
What have we done for YOU lately? Since 1984, CUB has
saved Oregon ratepayers more than $3.4 billion dollars.
>> read more |
|
« Texas Pacific abandons PGE bid |
Main
| Public Power Proposals »
April 16, 2005
What's next for PGE?
The question on everyone's lips after the denial of Texas Pacific Group's bid to purchase PGE is, "So now what?" The future of Portland General Electric is of interest to all PGE customers, residential, commercial and industrial, as well as to a range of economic and political leaders around the state.
Options currently being discussed include the sale of PGE to a public entity financed by either the City of Portland or the State of Oregon. CUB supports the development of both the City and State public ownership proposals. The City proposal has been on the table the longest, with Portland City Commissioner Erik Sten having taken an early lead on the issue, and Mayor Tom Potter joining Sten in supporting the proposal. The City has the ability to finance the purchase with low-interest government bonds and can move forward quickly.
The State of Oregon proposal has been a more recent proposal, but the bill that would create the State Power Authority, SB 618 (introduced by Senator Ryan Deckert), has the tentative support of the Governor's office. It has the advantage of a broader geographical base and would avoid the criticism of those who are wary of allowing the City of Portland to own, even in a purely formal way, a regional power utility.
Both of these proposed sales to Oregon governmental entities could present substantial rate savings to customers, based upon the use of tax-exempt financing for utility investments, the exemption of governmental entities from paying federal income tax (a tax which has for years been collected but never paid to government by Enron-owned PGE), and the removal of the need to pay a profit to private investors.
A third sale option has recently received some sizable press coverage, a "hybrid" organization purchase by a group calling itself Oregon Mutual Development Co (Mutual Utility). The hybrid would be a privately-run but customer-owned company, similar to a cooperative. Like the two public ownership models, the Mutual Utility would potentially have the advantages that no shareholders would exist to draw profit payments from the utility; and the utility would remain locally owned and managed, potentially with existing employees and executives.
There are, however, some key differences between the hybrid proposal and the two true public ownership models. To find out more specifics about the Mutual Utility Proposal, click here.
Of course, it's still possible that if none of these three proposals were to pan out, or if Enron were to simply refuse to accept these offers, PGE's stock could be distributed to Enron's creditors through the bankruptcy process. Over time, PGE might then be an independent, publicly-traded company again. Finally, there is a slight possibility that another corporate investment buyer would submit a proposal and be accepted by the PUC and the bankruptcy court. This is an unlikely wild card that has the most unknown variables.
In the meantime, we continue to work on the two public ownership proposals, trying to help craft a future for PGE that really would ensure customers' best interests.
| Proposals |
Financing |
Federal Taxes |
Shareholders |
Regulation by the PUC |
Location |
| Public Purchase City |
Tax-exempt bonds |
No |
No |
Not necessary |
Local |
| Public Purchase State |
Tax-exempt bonds |
No |
No |
Not necessary |
Local |
| Mutual Utility Purchase |
Market interest rates bonds |
Yes |
Customers |
Yes, but customers still liable for all costs |
Local |
| Stock Distribution |
Investor-financed purchase |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Local |
| Investment Buyer Purchase |
Investor-financed purchase |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Posted by Oregon CUB at April 16, 2005 11:39 AM
|
|
consumer tips
Tired of telemarketing calls? Maybe
it's time to put your number on the national Do Not Call list.
>> more
information
multimedia
This 10-minute video, produced by Eric Stachon of Sky
High Creative, gives a look at CUB’s history, why Oregon needed CUB to
begin with, and goes on to talk to some of our current allies and key
players in the world of utility regulation today.
>>
click here for the video
(Right-click to save the video to your desktop before viewing)
|
|