Keep up with CUB!
sign up for e-news
|
What have we done for YOU lately? Since 1984, CUB has
saved Oregon ratepayers more than $3.4 billion dollars.
>> read more |
|
« PUHCA fate will influence future of PGE |
Main
| Got a Question? »
April 21, 2005
Governor Withdraws from Competing State Bid for PGE
CUB understands Governor Kulongoski's decision not to have the State of Oregon compete with the City of Portland for the public purchase of PGE. We feel that this does not materially change the goal of a publicly-held utility company with low-cost, stable electricity for the almost 800,000 Oregonian customers that PGE currently serves.
A City of Portland-led purchase, with regional governance, or a State-backed regional ownership, or a combination of the two, would result in reaching our goal. According to CUB staff attorney, Jason Eisdorfer, "We have the bones of a good bill in SB 1008. So, we will hope to pass the bill out of committee today and continue to work on the language to make it as clear and tight a proposal for public power as it can be. That way, either the Legislature can act on the bill as a whole or potentially integrate it with the City proposal." [Note: the bill did pass out of the Senate Business & Economic Development Committee on 04/21/05.]
CUB has been encouraging the City and State to work together, and we hope that this decision on the part of the Governor will result in an increased willingness of those at the City and State levels to work cooperatively toward a regional public power utility. The bottom line, however, is that CUB will continue to actively support both proposals in hopes of helping to usher one or the other, or a combination of the two, towards the finish line.
Whether this shift in the politics of the public power proposals will affect other contenders for the future of PGE, such as the purchase proposal by Oregon Mutual Development Inc., is unclear. What it does do is strengthen the bargaining position of the City of Portland in purchase negotiations with Enron, and the City maintains its advantage of having worked on their bid the longest and being able to move forward most quickly in a restricted timeline. The stock distribution option remains a fall-back position that contains significant drawbacks in comparison to a locally owned public utility. (Please see "What about stock distribution for PGE?" for more information about this possibility.)
Posted by Oregon CUB at April 21, 2005 03:25 PM
|
|
consumer tips
Tired of telemarketing calls? Maybe
it's time to put your number on the national Do Not Call list.
>> more
information
multimedia
This 10-minute video, produced by Eric Stachon of Sky
High Creative, gives a look at CUB’s history, why Oregon needed CUB to
begin with, and goes on to talk to some of our current allies and key
players in the world of utility regulation today.
>>
click here for the video
(Right-click to save the video to your desktop before viewing)
|
|